![]() ![]() ![]() The absence of television footage or graphic photographs to illustrate events as they occurred fuelled a sense of frustration that the public was being deprived of information, even when the bare facts were announced by the authorities.ģThe conflict therefore generated much public debate about news coverage. So, even obtaining information about events as they unfolded in a way that made sense of otherwise unconnected incidents was a difficult task.ĢRepresentation of developments in the South Atlantic was further hampered by the difficulty experienced in obtaining pictures, even still photographs, that said anything really significant to a general public which had become used to the idea that modern news-gathering technology would provide a steady stream of television reports. This did not stop commentators from trying to make sense of events, but the interpretations that this guessing game led to were often very wide of the mark. ![]() Facts alone are of course not sufficient to understand what is really happening, and as in any military campaign the strategies and tactics adopted by the leaders of both sides remained secret. The distance, the vastness of the oceans and seas in which the naval engagements took place, the remote nature of the terrain and the fact that many of the most significant infantry battles took place at night, combined with the fact that there was little real enthusiasm on the part of the military authorities for encouraging a flow of news from the task force and from the islands, meant that hard facts were hard to come by. 1The Falklands conflict if 1982 was an event that generated intense interest, although very few people were able to witness anything of what went on in the South Atlantic. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |